Study · Nutrients · 2024Conflicts declared

Date and fruit bars: antioxidant response in healthy people

What it found

In 20 healthy young men, eating a date-based bar raised blood antioxidant markers more than a fruit-based bar over 3 hours, though most differences between the bars were small.

The bars were eaten in a crossover trial.

What they found

Studies in people

Blood phenolics after eating

Blood levels of total phenolic content rose after eating either bar and peaked at 120 minutes. The date bar led to higher levels than the fruit bar at 120 and 180 minutes.

Total antioxidant capacity

Total antioxidant capacity in the blood increased significantly 120 and 180 minutes after eating the date bar, but did not change significantly after the fruit bar. The average starting levels were 22.63 and 23.61 U per mL for the fruit and date bars, respectively.

MDA levels

MDA, a marker of oxidative stress, decreased significantly 180 minutes after eating the date bar, but did not change significantly after the fruit bar. Starting levels were about 19.83 to 20.11 nmol per mL.

SOD response

SOD levels responded significantly 120 minutes after eating the date bar, but showed no significant response up to 3 hours after the fruit bar. The date bar caused a 12.77% relative increase in SOD compared to the fruit bar.

Overall comparison

When the total 3-hour response was compared, only total phenolic content and SOD differed significantly between the two bars. Total antioxidant capacity and MDA did not differ significantly between the bars.

Other findings

Phenolic content in bars

The fruit-based bars had more free phenolic compounds than the date-based bars, while the date-based bars had more bound phenolic compounds. The amounts were 6.19 and 3.57 mg GAE per gram for free and bound in fruit bars, and 10.15 and 12.98 mg GAE per gram for free and bound in date bars.

What the authors conclude

“In conclusion, the relative changes in postprandial responses in T-AOC and MDA did not significantly ( p > 0.05) differ between DBBs and FBBs, except for TPC ( p = 0.04, paired t -test) and SOD ( p = 0.003, paired t -test).”
Alolyan MA, Alfheeaid HA, Alhowail AH, et al, 2024

Also in their conclusions

  • They conclude that the date bar increased total antioxidant capacity, decreased MDA, and raised SOD, while the fruit bar did not show these effects.
  • They state that further studies with an extended experimental time are needed to confirm the current findings.

How it was done

Nutritional bars are popular, but no one had looked at how they affect antioxidant levels in the blood after eating. The authors wanted to compare a date-based bar and a fruit-based bar for their effects on oxidative stress markers.

Twenty healthy men aged 19 to 25 ate 140 g (510 kcal) of either a date-based bar or a fruit-based bar on two separate days, 5 to 7 days apart. Blood was taken before eating and at 60, 120, and 180 minutes after.

What it can’t tell you

  • This was a small study in 20 healthy young men, so the results may not apply to women, older people, or people with health conditions.
  • The study only followed participants for 3 hours after eating, so it cannot show what happens over a longer period.
  • The study cannot show whether these short-term changes in blood markers lead to any long-term health effects.

The paper

Title
Postprandial Antioxidative Response to Ingestion of Formulated Date- and Fruit-Based Nutritional Bars by Healthy Individuals
Type
Study
Evidence
Studies in people
Summarised from
Full text
Licence
CC BY. Words in quotation marks are the authors’; the rest is our summary.
Cite
Alolyan MA, Alfheeaid HA, Alhowail AH, et al (2024). Postprandial Antioxidative Response to Ingestion of Formulated Date- and Fruit-Based Nutritional Bars by Healthy Individuals. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu16111794Free full textPubMed 38892726DOI

Summary written 30 Sep 2026. Check it against the paper before it changes what you eat. How we summarise papers · Report an error