Randomised trial · Nutrients · 2024Conflicts declared

Pecan nut snack compared with tortilla chips in overweight adults

What it found

In 20 adults with overweight or obesity, a mid-morning pecan snack caused a smaller rise in blood glucose and insulin than a tortilla chip snack.

Hunger, fullness and how much people ate at lunch were about the same after either snack.

What they found

Studies in people

Blood glucose

Blood glucose rose significantly more after the tortilla chip snack than after the pecan snack at all time points. After lunch, glucose responses did not differ between the two snacks.

Insulin

The tortilla chip snack caused a significant rise in insulin, while the pecan snack did not increase insulin. After lunch, insulin rose under both conditions with no significant difference.

Appetite and food intake

Ratings of hunger, fullness, desire to eat and prospective consumption did not differ between the pecan and tortilla chip snacks. Energy intake, weight of food and macronutrient composition at lunch also did not differ.

Satiety hormones

GLP-1 rose significantly more after the pecan snack than after the tortilla chips. PYY increased after lunch, and the rise was significantly greater in the pecan condition.

Fat markers in blood

Free fatty acids rose significantly after the pecan snack compared with tortilla chips. Triglycerides were higher in the pecan condition after lunch.

Energy expenditure

Resting energy expenditure rose by 7.4% after pecans and 10.9% after tortilla chips, but the difference was not significant.

What the authors conclude

“Pecan consumption improves postprandial glucose and insulin profiles which would be beneficial to individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.”
Peters JC, Breen JA, Pan Z, Nicklas J, Cornier MA, 2024

Also in their conclusions

  • They conclude that a single exposure to an isocaloric snack of either pecans or tortilla chips did not differentially affect subjective hunger, satiety, desire to eat, or prospective consumption.
  • They state that the more favorable post-ingestive profile of glucose and insulin after consuming pecans suggests that they may be beneficial to individuals at risk of developing metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes.
  • They call for further studies to explore whether increased PYY and GLP-1 after eating pecans versus tortilla chips may affect subjective appetite and energy intake over time.

How it was done

The authors say the effects of pecans compared with other popular snack foods on appetite and blood markers of metabolism and fullness have not been well studied. They wanted to compare a high-fat pecan snack with a typical high-carbohydrate savoury snack.

Twenty adults with overweight or obesity took part in a randomised crossover trial. On two separate visits, at least a week apart, they ate a standard breakfast, then a 250 kcal mid-morning snack of either pecans or tortilla chips, then a self-selected lunch. Blood samples, appetite ratings and energy expenditure were measured at intervals.

What it can’t tell you

  • This was a single snack test, so it cannot show what happens with long-term pecan consumption.
  • The study was mostly women, so it cannot show whether men respond differently.
  • The trial cannot show whether the changes in blood markers would affect appetite or weight over time.

The paper

Title
A Randomized, Crossover Trial Assessing Appetite, Energy Metabolism, Blood Biomarkers, and Ad Libitum Food Intake Responses to a Mid-Morning Pecan Snack vs. an Equicaloric High-Carbohydrate Snack in Healthy Volunteers with Overweight/Obesity
Type
Randomised controlled trial
Evidence
Studies in people
Summarised from
Full text
Licence
CC BY. Words in quotation marks are the authors’; the rest is our summary.
Cite
Peters JC, Breen JA, Pan Z, Nicklas J, Cornier MA (2024). A Randomized, Crossover Trial Assessing Appetite, Energy Metabolism, Blood Biomarkers, and Ad Libitum Food Intake Responses to a Mid-Morning Pecan Snack vs. an Equicaloric High-Carbohydrate Snack in Healthy Volunteers with Overweight/Obesity. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu16132084Free full textPubMed 38999832DOI

Summary written 30 Sep 2026. Check it against the paper before it changes what you eat. How we summarise papers · Report an error